[Emerging-Sigs] suggested rule change

Jack Pepper pepperjack at afferentsecurity.com
Fri Feb 22 09:33:23 EST 2008


on rule 2003330, rev:3.

I would suggest changing the "!$SMTP_SERVERS" field to be  
"![$DNS_SERVERS,$SMTP_SERVERS]".  This will prevent a few bogus hits.

before:
alert udp !$SMTP_SERVERS any -> $DNS_SERVERS 53 (msg:"ET POLICY  
Possible Spambot -- Host DNS MX Query High Count"; content: "|01 00|";  
offset: 2; depth: 4; content: "|00 0f 00 01|"; distance: 8;  
threshold:type both, count 30, seconds 10, track by_src;  
classtype:bad-unknown; sid:2003330; rev:3;)


after:
alert udp ![$DNS_SERVERS,$SMTP_SERVERS] any -> $DNS_SERVERS 53  
(msg:"ET POLICY Possible Spambot -- Host DNS MX Query High Count";  
content: "|01 00|"; offset: 2; depth: 4; content: "|00 0f 00 01|";  
distance: 8; threshold:type both, count 30, seconds 10, track by_src;  
classtype:bad-unknown; sid:2003330; rev:4;)

jp


-- 

Framework?  I don't need no stinking framework!

----------------------------------------------------------------
@fferent Security Labs:  Isolate/Insulate/Innovate  
http://www.afferentsecurity.com



More information about the Emerging-sigs mailing list