[Emerging-Sigs] Rule question

evilghost@packetmail.net evilghost at packetmail.net
Tue Oct 19 12:20:29 EDT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/19/2010 11:00 AM, Lay, James wrote:
> going from what used to be a relatively easy rule management system, to
> what it is now has been extremely time consuming and frustrating.

You're doing something wrong; the change was seamless and without strife
on this end.  Are you pushing the old 2.4 rules and the 2.x rules too?
Got any old stragglers?

- -evilghost
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=YIl4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Emerging-sigs mailing list