[Emerging-Sigs] Snort 2.9 compatibility with ET rules?

evilghost@packetmail.net evilghost at packetmail.net
Fri Oct 29 23:34:23 EDT 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 10/29/10 22:30, Matthew Jonkman wrote:
> I tried to answer you on the snort-users list but my email was
> suppressed I think. 

Wait, seriously?  I'd like to see if this is intentional (since on the ET lists
there's been quite a lot of sf-announce style stuff and breast-beating) or if
it's just their GMail/SourceForge list dying *again*.

I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt, most of the SF guys I've spoken
with are rational and fair, though using the VRT blog as a weapon was surprising.

- -evilghost
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=pRto
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Emerging-sigs mailing list